Monday, November 17, 2008

'Meh'. Whatever.

Apathetic Expression Enters Dictionary.

LONDON – At least someone is excited about "meh."

The expression of indifference or boredom has gained a place in the Collins English Dictionary after generating a surprising amount of enthusiasm among lexicographers.

Publisher HarperCollins announced Monday the word had been chosen from terms suggested by the public for inclusion in the dictionary's 30th anniversary edition, to be published next year.

The origins of "meh" are murky, but the term grew in popularity after being used in a 2001 episode of "The Simpsons" in which Homer suggests a day trip to his children Bart and Lisa.

"They both just reply 'meh' and keep watching TV," said Cormac McKeown, head of content at Collins Dictionaries.

The dictionary defines "meh" as an expression of indifference or boredom, or an adjective meaning mediocre or boring. Examples given by the dictionary include "the Canadian election was so meh."

Click here for the article.

PSF IV Publication Date Moved

From Notes From The Peanut Gallery:
Due to timing, scheduling and production issues, Philippine Speculative Fiction IV's publication is moved to February 2009.
More details here.

Manila Litcritters Open Session

The next Manila Litcritters Open session is at 2 p.m., November 22, 2008. Click here for details.

Chickened Out

A friend who read this post challenged me to use my manual typewriters for all my printing needs for a couple of weeks. He said he'd treat me to a restaurant of my choice if I succeeded.

I was tempted since the bet was over food, after all, but I didn't bite (pun intended--sorry, sorry).

I knew I'd lose. I am a bit of a luddite, but not to that extent. And I don't want to become a junkie for correction fluid fumes. :)

How Piracy Hurts Writers

We've all heard about how piracy is hurting those in software, film or TV, and music. Here's a link taken from The Bibliophile Stalker that talks about piracy from a writer's point-of-view: Heartsick, Depressed, and PO'd As Hell, from Jack Fleming's Journal. An excerpt:

Brace for incoming kvetching. I don't have the energy to rant. I'm too tired and depressed.race

I've lost a lot of writing time in the last few days.

Blame e-piracy.

Yar, ahoy thar, me hearty, here's some free books to download, enjoy!


Yep, nothing like a free e-book, right?

Only it is not free.

I was sent notice that ALL my novels had been put up on some mega-douchbag's website for free downloading. My books and those of 100s of other writers were up.

How this asshat thought he could get away with it for long is a mystery. Why he did it is a bigger mystery, 'cause I didn't see him getting any income for it. In the Elrod-verse "just because" is never a good excuse.

I notified my editors. One told me she'd already gotten mails from 10 other writers concerning that site.

There are other sites. I went to several, and put in the formal request to each that my books were up in violation of the Digital Media Copyright Act, please take them down, thank you. The hosts don't make it easy, either. I'm the only one who can legally do this, since I'm the copyright holder.

It's like playing Whack-a-Mole--take one down and more pop up. It eats my time. I'd rather be writing, dammit.

SFWA got involved, and someone on the host server yanked the jerk's website down as it was in violation of their TOS, not to mention the DMCA.

This was just one moron offering books he neither owns nor has a right to give away. He has friends. They proudly proclaim themselves to be e-pirates. Yar.

Sounds sexy, adventurous, fun--but let's remember that the old time pirates were only badly dressed, rather smelly thieves, just as scummy as any skank shoplifter taking a five-finger discount from a store. Nothing fun about 'em, and yes, it IS a crime.

They can holler and scream all they like about how cool it is to share information freely, but down and dirty--they are thieves pimping to other thieves. Downloading a book without paying for it is theft.

Ironically, fans are stealing from the very writers they profess to love so much.

Guess what--that kind of thing can wreck a career. Specifically, MINE.

Here's what happens when people download books illegally instead of (gasp) buying a download from Amazon or B&N or even getting a temporary download via the public library.

An illegal download is not recorded as a sale for P.N. Elrod. The publisher's bean-counters notice this when sales of my books don't happen. "Hey, Elrod's books aren't moving, we better not buy new ones from her. Call her editor, get those titles remaindered, and cut that deadbeat loose."

(For those who have trouble finding my books, it is because slow sales sent them out of print and into the remainder pile. They're still to be found on Amazon and in used stores, I don't have a problem with any of that. I don't have a problem with you loaning books to each other. As some point in its life it was bought and the sale was counted.)

But a lot of mid-list writers like me are getting the professional chop due to low sales. I've been afraid myself. I am STILL afraid. My next book could be rejected, not because it's a bad book, but because my sales figures aren't up to snuff.

Click here to read the whole post and the comments.

So, think twice about downloading e-books illegally (but if these e-books are released with the full permission of the author and the publisher, that's fine). You may think it's all right, but really, it's not. You're hurting publishers and writers, and all those connected to the industry. Think of the printing machine operators. Think of those who supply ink, paper, and other items to the operators. Think of those who do the lay-outs. Think of the administrative and logistical staff at publishing houses. Buy the books and magazines, please. I'm not sure if a 2nd-hand book or mag is given sales credit (probably not--seems to be that would be a double-count), but at least you're buying the physical item, and it's nice to think that another person is using the product the way it was meant to be used (in a way, it's like recycling). And if you do wish to download, then download the legal file and pay for it as you would a regular book or mag.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

A Case For "The Education Of The Imagination"

Check out this post from Dogberry, an English teacher: "Poetry, The Education Of The Imagination, And The American South".

He shares with us an essay by Billy Collins which he requires his students to read before he starts his poetry course, and he makes a strong argument for literature and why we take it up in school. In fact, it's a strong case to continue our reading even after school is done. An excerpt:

To study literature is to learn to imagine the life of the other....When we read a story written by someone different from us — someone from another time, place, or culture — we learn to accommodate that person's humanity in our own. We broaden our hearts to allow that person, no matter how different in outlook of perspective, a place in them. This, I think, is what Collins refers to as "intellectual openness" and "conceptual sympathy," and fostering these values and habits of mind and heart in students is an essential part of a liberal education. We're not in the business merely of preparing kids for jobs.

Dogberry relates this to the election data of the recently concluded U.S. Presidential elections. I heard a CNN reporter say on TV that taking the U.S. as a whole, race was not the major issue that some thought it would be (it was the economy). But in studying how demographics reflected voting trends in the American South, and disregarding the rest of the country, race was a stronger factor. Dogberry goes on:

These places are on the whole "less exposed to the diversity, educational achievement and economic progress experienced by more prosperous areas." We might say that, in the words of Billy Collins, the people in these places are lacking in "intellectual openness" and "intellectual sympathy." In simpler terms, these folks had a hard time accepting the idea that a black man would make a good president.

No surprise that racism goes hand in hand with religious bigotry, the arrogance that comes with the certainty that one is on God's side. It is the illusion of a startling clarity spawned by moral blindness.

Such blindness is what an education of the imagination seeks to combat. The report above reminds us how important the struggle is, and what hangs in the balance.

Click here to read his entire post.

Friday, November 14, 2008

Full Grinch Mode



Yes, I've been hearing carols on the radio and the TV since early September (I just change stations).

Yes, I've been hearing the same on piped-in music, be it in stores, elevators, or public transportation (I leave as soon as I can, or turn up the volume on my iPod).

Yes, the tinsel, wreathes, and what-have-you have been up everywhere since mid-October (I choose to ignore them).

But when I came home the other day and discovered that some members of the household took it upon themselves to put up what decor we owned? Well...

As with last year, and every year, I am now in Full Grinch Mode! Grrr...

Who's with me?!

(There is one Christmas CD that I still enjoy, even up to today, but I'll listen to and blog about it in December, the proper time for it).

Miguel Syjuco Wins 2008 Man Asian Literary Prize

From the Man Asian Literary Prize website:

Hong Kong, 13 November 2008 – A panel of three internationally acclaimed authors and experienced literary judges named Filipino author Miguel Syjuco winner of the 2008 Man Asian Literary Prize for his novel Ilustrado, a fictional account of a young Filipino caught within a notorious scandal spanning over the Philippine history.

The panel of judges for the 2008 prize praised Ilustrado:

"The shortlist for the Man Asian prize testifies to the great vitality of the novel in Asian societies undergoing hectic and unexpected transformations. In the end, we had to choose; and Ilustrado seems to us to possess formal ambition, linguistic inventiveness and sociopolitical insight in the most satisfying measure. Brilliantly conceived, and stylishly executed, it covers a large and tumultuous historical period with seemingly effortless skill. It is also ceaselessly entertaining, frequently raunchy, and effervescent with humour."

The prize winner was announced at a celebratory dinner at The Peninsula Hong Kong. Miguel Syjuco was awarded USD 10,000.

Ilustrado was selected from shortlist of five:
Kavery Nambisan, The Story that Must Not be Told
Siddharth Dhanvant Shanghvi, The Lost Flamingoes of Bombay
Miguel Syjuco, Ilustrado
Yu Hua, Brothers
Alfred A. Yuson, The Music Child
Read an excerpt here.

Wonderful, wonderful news! Congratulations!

The Philippine Speculative Fiction Sampler

Mia Tijam (author of "Blink, Wake Up" from PGS4) and Charles Tan (author of "The Devil Is In The Details" from PGS3 and "The Jar Collector" from The Special PGS Horror Issue) are the co-editors for The Philippine Speculative Fiction Sampler, which has just been launched.

The Introduction (by Charles Tan):

My first and foremost goal in setting up this website is to promote Philippine literature, specifically those who write in the field we call speculative fiction. In the past four years, it seems like there's been a huge boom in this category, whether it's the appearance of publications like Philippine Speculative Fiction, The Digest of Philippine Genre Stories, and Story Philippines, or the emergence of competitions like the Philippine Graphic/Fiction Awards.

However, as prolific or talented Filipino writers might be, one of my concerns is that their work doesn't get read outside of the Philippines, or even Metro Manila for that matter. And in this day and age of the Internet, it's not an impossible hurdle to overcome. That's not to say Filipino writers aren't being published abroad or online. They're even being acknowledged in anthologies like The Year's Best Fantasy and Horror. In case of the former though, that only accounts for a small percentage of our output and in the case of the latter, prospective readers don't really have convenient methods of reading the said work.

Thus me and my co-editor, Mia Tijam (a talented writer in her own right and perhaps even a keener literary critic) selected various locally-published stories which might serve as a sampler of sorts. As much as possible, we avoided texts that were readily available online, and we looked through publications printed in the past four years to limit our scope. What we hope is a selection of stories that both Filipinos and readers abroad can appreciate.

It's not only Mia and Charles who are familiar names from PGS involved with this project. I see Dominique Cimafranca, Andrew Drilon, M.R.R. Arcega, Michael Co, Dean Francis Alfar, F.H. Batacan, and Apol Lejano-Massebieau.

Click here to visit the site and read the stories!

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Free And Legal Audio Short Story

Check out the "Luck Of The Draw" audio link over at The New Yorker. The free audio file is a reading of Shirley Jackson's most famous short story, "The Lottery", which was first published in The New Yorker in June, 1948.

Another Foot Found

Holy crow, this is still going on: Apparent 6th Severed Foot Found In British Columbia.

What appears to be a separated human foot inside a shoe -- possibly the sixth discovered in Canada's British Columbia in the past 15 months -- has been found on a riverbank, Royal Canadian Mounted Police said Wednesday.

The shoe -- a left New Balance running shoe -- was found about 11:30 a.m. Tuesday on the south arm of the Fraser River by a Richmond, British Columbia, couple, police said.

It was turned over to the British Columbia Coroners Service for examination and DNA testing, authorities said.

Before Tuesday, five feet -- all inside running shoes -- had washed ashore in southern British Columbia since August 2007. One of them, a right New Balance shoe, was found May 22 on Kirkland Island. That foot was determined to belong to a female, authorities said.

Click here to read the whole article.

Gawd, what a mystery, and what a crime.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

2008 Oxford Word Of The Year

And the winner is...

Hypermiling: to attempt to maximize gas mileage by making fuel-conserving adjustments to one’s car and one’s driving techniques.

A suitable word of the year, given how high gas prices became, and still are.

Some interesting contenders:

Frugalista: person who leads a frugal lifestyle, but stays fashionable and healthy by swapping clothes, buying second-hand, growing own produce, etc.

Wardrobe: has become a verb, as in: Ms. Mendes has a long-standing relationship with the house of Calvin Klein and has been wardrobed by Calvin Klein Collection.

Rewilding: the process of returning an area to its original wild state/flora/fauna etc.

With my habit of guessing meanings of words and terms before looking them up, this last one definitely got me thinking:

Topless Meeting

I will not provide the definition. You can just read the whole article about the 2008 Oxford Word Of The Year for yourselves, if you wish. (But make a guess first before clicking, just for fun.)

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Happy And Unhappy Jobs

From the site, The Work Buzz, I found this article: Happy Jobs: Job Satisfaction Survey. It lists the ten happiest and unhappiest jobs from their survey.

Happiest Jobs:
1. Clergy
2. Physical Therapists
3. Firefighters
4. Education Administrators
5. Painters/Sculptors
6. Teachers
7. Authors
8. Psychologists
9. Special Education Teachers
10. Operating Engineers

Unhappiest Jobs:
1. Roofers
2. Waiters/Servers
3. Laborers
4. Bartenders
5. Hand Packers And Packagers
6. Freight And Stock Handlers
7. Apparel Salespersons
8. Cashiers
9. Food Preparers
10. Expediters.

Note #7 under "Happiest Jobs".

So, is the image of the tortured writer carrying the burden of his art, his stories, his view of the world, more the exception than the rule? Is the picture of him tearing his hair out and slaving the loneliest of his hours away in search of the perfect word, sentence, paragraph, not the norm? :)

If you're a writer, are you happy?

I notice #4 under "Unhappiest Jobs": Bartenders. I guess the weight of carrying all the problems of their drinking customers can be quite a burden. I'm sure they wish they could charge by the hour, like psychiatrists. I mean, bartenders can say, "So how does that make you feel?", just like anyone else. :D

Three Links From The Bibliophile Stalker

Here are three interesting links I picked up from The Bibliophile Stalker's blog:

1. How the New York Times See SF/F (c/o Ms. Ellen Datlow's blog). An excerpt of the various quotes:

"Maybe the right question to ask about Neil Gaiman isn't ''Why is he so
fixated on dreams?'' but ''Why aren't more of his fellow fantasy writers as
obsessed with the topic as he is?'' After all, dreams would seem to be the ideal
subject matter for any author of speculative fiction."
---"Dreamland," Nov. 5, 2006

" 'Dune,'' published in 1965, remains a perfect, self-contained work of
science fiction."
---"Dune Babies," Sept. 24, 2006

"HERE'S a question I don't expect to come anywhere close to answering by the
end of this column: Why does contemporary science fiction have to be so
geeky?"
---"It's All Geek to Me," March 5, 2006

"Even in a science fiction writer´s most inaccurate predictions, there are
sometimes valuable truths to be gleaned."

---"Alice's Alias," Aug. 5, 2006

"I sometimes wonder how any self-respecting author of speculative fiction
can find fulfillment in writing novels for young readers."
---"Elsewhere's Children," Feb. 3, 2008

2. Guest blogger Matthew Cheney: "If I'd Only Known: Writing Advice To My Younger Self". An excerpt:

I've been to all sorts of different writing workshops over the years. I'll probably go to more in the future. I like being around people who care about writing, and I love talking shop. But when I started going to workshops, and at first when I was an undergraduate in NYU's Dramatic Writing Program, I thought workshops would teach me The Secret. I'd read the writing guides -- heck, I'd memorized them! -- and I hadn't learned what The Secret was, so I figured it must be kept by the teachers of writing workshops.

Here's The Secret: There is no Secret.

I really learned that when one of my NYU teachers, a wonderful writer himself and a marvelous teacher, asked me how I wrote so consistently. I was flabbergasted. "Practice?" I said sheepishly. "I thought so," he said, apparently disappointed. He thought I'd found The Secret and could tell it to him.

Publication can be fun, but I don't think a healthy psyche finds it much more than that. If you haven't been able to find balance and contentment in your life, publishing won't help you, and, if anything, it may hurt. It may encourage arrogance or it may cause new neuroses -- the common fear, for instance, among many successful artists of all sorts that one day somebody will find out "the truth" and prove to the world that you are a fraud.

There's more to life than writing, but writing can be a way to discover life. Use it for that, and you'll surprise yourself sometimes with what you find. Those occasional moments of discovery make all the false starts, clunky sentences, discarded pages, missed opportunities, embarrassing mistakes, and creative failures disappear just long enough to stop stinging.

3. The Internet Vs. Books: Peaceful Coexistence. An excerpt:

In theory, a tool like Google should free us to be more creative. In reality, there are pitfalls.

Jan Frel is an editor at the progressive news site AlterNet and a cultural critic who takes a wider perspective, holding that writing in general, rather than a reliance on oral tradition, has had a deleterious effect on culture. "This is a weird aberration," she says, "all these people writing instead of one story being written by many people."

Frel likes the open-endedness of an Internet where "you can imagine knowledge and then find it." But there is a downside, which, according to Frel, is rather dire: "Pretty good has become the new perfection."

When Alexander Solzhenitsyn memorized passages of "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich," he had no choice but to enact the modernist version of oral traditions. This was not an expression of collective culture so much as an extreme example of what T.S. Eliot called "the individual talent."

Today's blogs are a mutation of Solzhenitsyn's modernist mythmaking -- where the merely personal becomes a matter of permanent record. Increasingly, mainstream writers cite blogs. Political journalists use them as sources. According to CommonSenseMedia.org, 74% of journalists recently surveyed regularly read blogs, and 84% "say they would or already have used blogs as a primary or secondary source for articles."

Books require a different sort of communion with one's subject than the Internet. They foster a different sort of memory -- more tactile, more participatory. I know more or less where, folio-wise, Eliot gets nasty about the Jews in his infamous 1933 lecture series "After Strange Gods," but I always have to read around a bit to find the exact quote, and the time spent softens the bite of his anti-Semitism because the hateful remarks were made amid smart ones. For literary works, books are still, and most likely always will be, indispensable.

"The Internet is a volume in our library," Ackerman says, "a colorful, miscellaneous, and serendipitous one -- but not a replacement for books, and certainly not an alternative to spending time in the world and just paying attention to things." Moulitsas believes it's the future, and the old guard needs to get with the times.

For the time being, both of them are right.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Going Old School (Sometimes)







Last week, late one afternoon, just as I had powered down my computers and switched off all the lights, I suddenly remembered that I needed to print a short business letter, and had forgotten to do so. Tsk-tsk. Such an old man.

Normally, I print my correspondence on an inkjet or a laser, or even on my twenty-year old Epson dot-matrix, which has served me well and still does; it works without a hitch, just as it did when it was brand new. But did I turn the computers on again? Naah. I was too impatient, especially for a simple six-sentence business letter; typing the darn thing would probably be quicker than waiting for the computer and printer to boot up. This wasn't the first time this had happened to me, so I knew what to do: I still have in my possession two manual typewriters, and one of them was coming to my rescue in my fateful, forgetful need!

To be honest, I still use these typewriters from time to time, to make short documents, and yes, even to write; it's fun to hear the physical clickety-clack of the keys. As my lawyer friend once told me, a document manually typed is just as good and legal as any printed via computer printer.

I brought out the smaller typewriter first from its hiding place in the closet behind my desk. It's an early 1970's Brother, a brand known more for their fax machines nowadays. It once was used in an office in Binondo until the owner closed shop and migrated; it found its way to my family sometime after. I placed it on an empty table and was about to insert a sheet of paper into it when I noticed that the main roller was wobbly.

Oh-oh, the old cylinder had come loose, and the paper wouldn't catch. I didn't know how to fix it, but that was okay. I still had another typewriter to turn to, one given to me and my siblings by my parents for our schoolwork. It's a bigger, heavier machine, a bulky Olympia, the Brother's junior by about a decade. We used this quite often for many, many years, even after we already bought our first computer (which had come with the Epson).

The Olympia sat on a corner table, forgotten by everyone except me. I walked to it, took off its cover, inserted a sheet of paper, and pulled up a chair; I started to type. I can't be certain, but as I clickety-clacked my way through the letter, I wouldn't be surprised if someone would have caught me smiling.

Problem was, about halfway through the letter, something jammed. The carriage moved along normally, but the ribbon turner stayed stationary. Something was wrong with the Olympia, and the ribbon wouldn't turn and transfer its ink to the paper. In other words, I was typing, but nothing was printing (the computer equivalent is a busted keyboard). Argh. What to do, what to do. The ribbon itself was pretty dry and old already, so there was nothing for it but to remove the cover and rewind the spool manually (try and do that with a computer keyboard). So I did this, and finished typing my letter, but it grated on my nerves that both my manual typewriters were clearly busted. No! How could such old, reliable friends have broken down at the same time? The office gremlin was behind this, I'll bet; I reminded myself to deal with him later.

I succeeded in finishing my letter, but I didn't want to leave my typewriters marginally unusable. I still remember basic typewriter troubleshooting, but sadly, to repair them was beyond my skill. In this day and age of high-end electronic thingummies, there was only one place to bring such old contraptions to be fixed. I put both machines in my car's trunk and headed for Sesame Street, to The Fix It Shop, where I lugged them in to Maria and Luis, who welcomed me like an old friend (which, in fact, I am). Though their specialty is pop-up toasters, they also knew what to do with manual typewriters. Of all people, surely they could fix them!

After greeting each other and laughing about old times, I told them about my typewriters. I placed them on their worktable, they pored over my machines, and said that they just needed to replace the broken ribbon-auto-reverse-thingamajig in the Olympia, and to tighten some loose screws in the Brother. At the mention of loose screws, Oscar walked in, and we all giggled to ourselves, and he got grouchy at us, but we didn't let on what the laughter was about. They also advised me to bring them some fresh ribbons, which I did after a quick trip to Mr. Hooper's Store (yes, they now sell office supplies): P43.00 for two typewriter ribbons. To think the cost of a new inkjet cartridge is about P1,000.00. And Maria and Luis didn't charge me much for their services either, certainly much, much less than the cost of a new inkjet cartridge. But they did extract from me a promise to visit Sesame Street more often, and to take care of my typewriters because, after all, they can still do the job right. No sense letting stuff go to waste, even if they're old, as long as they still work.

We talked a bit more, and when we ran out of old memories to smile about, we waved goodbye to each other, leaving Oscar still wondering what the joke was about. Now I'm back, and my manual typewriters are in working order once more. I will keep my promise to take care of them and to use them more often (but I have to admit that correcting typos and other errors is so much easier on the computer, and you don't have to deal with messy correction fluid on your fingers). Nevertheless, they still work, and that's what counts.

A final note: I've talked to the office gremlin and made him promise not to do anything to any of the machines in the office again, even the typewriters. He grumbled a bit at this, but brightened up when I handed him a small scrap of paper with the address of a competitor written on it. "We hate to see you go," I told him, "but you're too good at what you do to be limited by our small-market company. You deserve to play in the big leagues." So he left, and we shook hands with full respect for each other, but I could see he had tears in his eyes as he was leaving, the softie. For his sake, I pretended to shed some myself.

Seth Godin On Free Content And Publishing

Seth Godin, a writer of bestselling business books, shares his thoughts on free content and the publishing industry. An excerpt from his interview:

If everything is free, how is anyone going to make any money?

First, the market and the internet don't care if you make money. That's important to say. You have no right to make money from every development in media, and the humility that comes from approaching the market that way matters. It's not "how can the market make me money" it's "how can I do things for this market." Because generally, when you do something for an audience, they repay you. The Grateful Dead made plenty of money. Tom Peters makes many millions of dollars a year giving speeches, while books are a tiny fraction of that. Barack Obama used ideas to get elected, book royalties are just a nice side effect. There are doctors and consultants who profit from spreading ideas. Novelists and musicians can make money with bespoke work and appearances and interactions. And you know what? It's entirely likely that many people in the chain WON'T make any money. That's okay. That's the way change works.

How do you think publishers and authors could work more productively together?

Publishing is far too focused on the pub day. The event of the publication. This is a tiny drip, perhaps the least important moment in a long timeline. As soon as publishers see themselves as marketers and agents and managers and developers of content, things change.

What's the most important lesson the book publishing industry can learn from the music industry?

The market doesn't care a whit about maintaining your industry. The lesson from Napster and iTunes is that there's even MORE music than there was before. What got hurt was Tower and the guys in the suits and the unlimited budgets for groupies and drugs. The music will keep coming. Same thing is true with books. So you can decide to hassle your readers (oh, I mean your customers) and you can decide that a book on a Kindle SHOULD cost $15 because it replaces a $15 book, and if you do, we (the readers) will just walk away. Or, you could say, "if books on the Kindle were $1, perhaps we could create a vast audience of people who buy books like candy, all the time, and read more and don't pirate stuff cause it's convenient and cheap..." I'm a pessimist that the book industry will learn from music. How are you betting?

Click here to read the whole post.

A Writer's Letter To The Recently Elected

Alice Walker, author of The Color Purple, writes a letter to U.S. President-Elect Barack Obama. There is much in the letter for us regular folk, too. An excerpt:

Dear Brother Obama,

You have no idea, really, of how profound this moment is for us. Us being the black people of the Southern United States. You think you know, because you are thoughtful, and you have studied our history. But seeing you deliver the torch so many others before you carried, year after year, decade after decade, century after century, only to be struck down before igniting the flame of justice and of law, is almost more than the heart can bear. And yet, this observation is not intended to burden you, for you are of a different time, and, indeed, because of all the relay runners before you, North America is a different place. It is really only to say: Well done. We knew, through all the generations, that you were with us, in us, the best of the spirit of Africa and of the Americas. Knowing this, that you would actually appear, someday, was part of our strength. Seeing you take your rightful place, based solely on your wisdom, stamina and character, is a balm for the weary warriors of hope, previously only sung about.

I would advise you to remember that you did not create the disaster that the world is experiencing, and you alone are not responsible for bringing the world back to balance. A primary responsibility that you do have, however, is to cultivate happiness in your own life. To make a schedule that permits sufficient time of rest and play with your gorgeous wife and lovely daughters. And so on. One gathers that your family is large. We are used to seeing men in the White House soon become juiceless and as white-haired as the building; we notice their wives and children looking strained and stressed. They soon have smiles so lacking in joy that they remind us of scissors. This is no way to lead. Nor does your family deserve this fate. One way of thinking about all this is: It is so bad now that there is no excuse not to relax. From your happy, relaxed state, you can model real success, which is all that so many people in the world really want. They may buy endless cars and houses and furs and gobble up all the attention and space they can manage, or barely manage, but this is because it is not yet clear to them that success is truly an inside job. That it is within the reach of almost everyone.

Click here to read the rest of her open letter.

Vituperative, Abstemious, Amaneunsis

The 7-chapter article I read here (and which I mentioned here) from Newsweek had me reaching for the dictionary more than once, moreso on those three words in the title of this post.

I kinda' had a hint as to what "vituperative" meant, but only from from context. The second one, "abstemious" I more or less gleaned, also from context, but also because it's close to "abstain", which is near to what it means. The last one, "amaneunsis", left me groping (I thought it was a disease of some sort).

Thanks to Newsweek reporters I learned three new words last week, and a few more. These are all words that I doubt I will ever use in normal conversation. I think only the Queen of $5.00 words (author of "Beacon" from PGS2) would know the definitions of these words without needing to look them up.

Interesting Post On History Revisionism

From Zen In Darkness, this link: Remembering The Battle Of Manila, posted by Nontrivial Pursuit. An excerpt:

Just watched Remembering the Battle of Manila, a two-hour documentary on the 1945 battle produced by Japanese television network NHK and aired on the History Channel.

Most troubling about this documentary is that it's primarily meant for a Japanese audience, being translated into English after it was made. If PBS made this documentary for an American audience it would be a soul-searching second look at America's actions in Manila deserving of a commendation. But it's not. The documentary was made by NHK for a Japanese audience, making it an exercise in washing their hands of guilt. Far from just "remembering the battle of Manila", this looks and feels more like a jab at self-vindication, as if saying, "Hey, the Americans killed more Filipinos than we did; we were just defending ourselves." To lay the blame for the destruction of Manila and the death of 100,000 civilians at the foot of the Americans with only passing mention of Japanese atrocities is, to say the least, dishonest.

Click here to read the whole post.